In this day and age, it seems that more and more kids have at least one step-parent. Divorce rates are extremely high, leaving kids with a custodial parent and a non-custodial parent. But is parenting restricted solely to the biological parents? I think not.
Let’s look at a hypothetical situation. Mom and bio-Dad get married and have, let’s say 2, kids. Mom finds that due to bio-Dad’s compulsive spending, lying and verbal abuse that she can’t let the kids grow up in that kind of unhealthy environment. She finds a lawyer and files for divorce. Bio-Dad is in a situation where his job pays a supplement for family members, but he refuses to send the money for the kids. Instead, he buys a cell-phone and other luxury items for himself. Once the divorce goes to court because bio-Dad refused to let it go uncontested, the judge finds that bio-Dad is already refusing to pay support. Bio-Dad’s lawyer manages to get a lower support payment for bio-Dad, but bio-Dad still refuses to pay.
Bio-Dad continues refusal of payment even though the court has lowered his obligation and dismissed back support owed to date. Mom allows phone calls and visitations despite non-receipt of support.
About a year after the divorce is final, Mom remarries a wonderful guy we’ll call step-Dad. The kids take to step-Dad like fish to water. Wonderful relationships grow and blossom from this union. Mom and step-Dad have 2 more kids, but step-Dad continues to foster growth in academics, spirituality and correct behavior in the older kids. Step-Dad is also providing all support for the family financially as Mom is at home taking care of and homeschooling the kids. Bio-Dad still refuses to make support payments. Mom addresses concern to step-Dad who then encourages Mom to take whatever actions we can without the expense of a lawyer.
Mom tries at least three times to have bio-Dad’s paycheck garnished. The first two times, Mom had what she thought were valid work addresses, but the garnishment papers were returned to the courts. The third time, Mom finally had a correct work address (when bio-Dad was supposed to provide current info at all times) and got the garnishment to go through. Mom doesn’t mention the garnishment to bio-Dad until he notices it on his next paycheck. Bio-Dad calls and says “thanks” for taking the money out because he can’t remember to send the checks every two weeks to support his kids.
Meanwhile, step-Dad continues to provide love and support to all four kids in the house. He loves all the kids like they are his own and treats them equally according to their ages and abilities. Step-Dad has become “daddy” to the older kids, even though they realize that he is not their bio-dad. In fact, the older kids recognize step-Dad as their provider and bio-Dad as someone who fathered them but doesn’t seem interested in them (due to lack of contact on bio-Dad’s part) or their lives. Step-Dad encourages the kids to participate in activities such as Cub Scouts, church choir, and alter service to further their spiritual development.
You tell me. Is the bio-Dad the “dad” or just the father? My opinion stands that step-Dad here is the “dad” to these kids, not bio-Dad. Bio-Dad simply provided genetic material to help produce these kids but does little else in the way of nurturing or providing for the kids. So, in this situation, Dad does not equal Father.
Any man can be a father, but it takes a real man to be a dad.














